HOME ABOUT CONTACT PREVIOUS ISSUES SUBSCRIBE MEDIA & ADS CONFERENCE CALENDAR
LATEST UPDATES » Intelligent Sensor Informs You to Change a Diaper via SMS       » University of Manchester & A*STAR ongoing partnership- Joint PhD programme       » Philippines Healthcare & New Digital Platform, MyDoc.       » Tapping on ASEAN'S Healthcare Opportunities through Singapore       » ASEAN: The New Playing Field for Global Medical Device Companies       » The Burden of Great Potential: the ASEAN Economic Community & Biopharmaceuticals       » When there is no Queen in the house, Asian Hive Bees Avoid Risky Foraging for Reproduction       » XELJANZTM (Tofacitinib Citrate), A new class of treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis Approved in Singapore      
BIOBOARD - EUROPE
ACADIA鈥檚 pimavanserin sees Phase III success
A CADIA Pharmaceuticals has reported successful Top-line results from its pivotal Phase III trial evaluating the efficacy, tolerability and safety of pimavanserin (ACP-103) in patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP). Pimavanserin is ACADIA's proprietary, non-dopaminergic product candidate that selectively blocks 5-HT2A receptors.

The primary endpoint of the trial was antipsychotic efficacy as measured using the SAPS-PD, a nine-item scale adapted from the hallucinations and delusions domains of the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, by comparing the mean change from baseline to day 43 for pimavanserin versus placebo. SAPS-PD assessments were performed by blinded, independent centralized raters. The pimavanserin arm demonstrated a 5.79 point improvement in psychosis at day 43 compared to a 2.73 point improvement for placebo, representing a highly significant and clinically meaningful treatment difference of 3.06 points on SAPS-PD (p=0.001).

The key secondary endpoint of the trial evaluated motoric tolerability and functional outcome using Parts II and III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). The objective of this secondary endpoint was to demonstrate that pimavanserin could achieve its antipsychotic effects without worsening motor function as compared to placebo in PDP patients. A pre-specified, non-inferiority analysis was used to compare the mean change from baseline to day 43 for pimavanserin versus placebo using a two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference. Motoric improvements were seen in both the pimavanserin and placebo arms, and the CI associated with the treatment difference did not exceed a pre-specified margin of five points for clinically relevant change, confirming that pimavanserin met this key secondary endpoint and did not worsen motor function in PDP patients.

The secondary efficacy measure in the trial was an assessment of clinical global improvement by the investigator using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Pimavanserin demonstrated a highly significant improvement on this measure (p=0.001), further supporting its antipsychotic efficacy. In addition, other clinical benefits of pimavanserin were observed in exploratory efficacy measures of sleep and caregiver burden. Sleep was assessed using the SCOPA-sleep scale, which was designed to enable the investigator to evaluate nighttime sleep and daytime wakefulness in PD patients. Pimavanserin demonstrated significant improvements on both nighttime sleep (p=0.045) and daytime wakefulness (p=0.012) on SCOPA.

Caregiver burden was assessed using the Caregiver Burden Scale. This scale was completed by the caregiver to provide a quantitative assessment of burden associated with the patient's functional/behavioral impairments, the circumstances of at-home care, as well as the caregiver's health, social life and interpersonal relations. Pimavanserin demonstrated a highly significant improvement on the Caregiver Burden Scale (p=0.002).

Consistent with previous studies, pimavanserin was safe and well tolerated in this trial. Based on a preliminary analysis of safety data, the most common adverse events were urinary tract infection (11.7 per cent for placebo versus 13.5 per cent pimavenserin) and falls (8.5 per cent versus 10.6 per cent). Adverse events were generally characterized as mild-to-moderate in nature. The only serious adverse events that occurred in more than one patient were urinary tract infection (1-placebo versus 3-pimavenserin) and psychotic disorder (0 versus 2). Ninety per cent of the patients who completed the clinical phase of this trial elected to roll over into the ongoing open-label safety extension study. Patients were only eligible to participate in the extension study if the treating investigator also deemed them to be likely to benefit from continued treatment with pimavanserin.

Click here for the complete issue.

EDITORS' CHOICE  

Credits to: American Chemical Society
COLUMNS  

APBN Editorial Calendar 2015
Trends and Predictions for 2015 Robotics in Healthcare Nutrition Universal Health Coverage
Start-Up Biotech Companies Preventative and Translational Medicine Biofuels ASEAN Economic Community and Asia's Life Sciences Industry
Big Data: Healthcare and Drug Development Antibody Engineering in Japan Christmas Edition
APBN Editorial Calendar 2016
Korea's Biotechnology Industry Nutrition and Allergies: Are we, Too Clean? Medical Devices and Technology: Innovation that leaves an Inspiration Tobacco Smoking: The 'Real' Cost of One Cigarette
Life-Saving Opportunities: A Guide to Regenerative Medicine Occupational Health Water Technology Olympics: Evolution of Sports
Respiratory: Seasonal flu viruses
MAGAZINE TAGS
About Us
Events
Available issues
Editorial Board
Letters to Editor
Instructions to Authors
Advertise with Us
CONTACT
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
5 Toh Tuck Link, Singapore 596224
Tel: 65-6466-5775
Fax: 65-6467-7667
» Editorial Enquiries: biotech_edit@wspc.com
» For Subscriptions, Advertisements &
   Media Partnerships Enquiries:
   Ms PoPo Kwok or Ms Sok Ching Lim
Copyright© 2015 World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd  •  Privacy Policy